Thursday, July 26, 2007

informal poll on e-books

Here are the results of an informal poll about e-books ! i sent this to about 15 friends, who work inside and outside libraries (one purchases materials for the boston public library, she said, downloadable books are more popular than e-books, they have a popular program there which is called "overdrive" and announced on their website, i have not investigated, yet)

(another is an ex-librarian, whose partner works for microsoft and is therefore on the cutting edge of technology)

almost all were americans, some living in france, most in the US!

although this sample is by no means representative, it gives, i think, a good idea of what people use etc.

quotes:

E-books do not seem very popular – except at Library and publishers’ conferences!

I don’t know anyone who reads them. It is no fun reading off a screen. But downloading audio books onto an Ipod is a big new thing.

I'm not at all keen on E-books. Love holding a book in my hands and reading in bed.

I really don't think e-books are the thing now ...the readers are expensive $500 each. E-books are mostly used in corporate settings and academic settings...a good way to have access to a larger collection without having to buy books...just buy into a service that provides access to e-books.

I don't personally know anyone who uses them much. It's still more enjoyable and easier to take a book in hand and sit where and how one wants. Reading off a screen for a long time has its drawbacks.

we dont have ebooks tho we have something similar and they are very popular at least here. i think lots of people listen to them in their car, maybe not so much driving in paris tho maybe on the metro.. if you go to bpls webpage our program for downloading books and videos and music to computers,etc. is called overdrive. we are really reviing it up this yr. bigger budget, more frequent orders. last yr we ordered very infrequently due to budgets.

My conclusion: I think we should invest into audio-books people can download unto their computers or i-pods rather than e-books.

Future of Librarians Interviews

from the blog: tame the web: libraries and technology
small icon of michael stephens
Michael Stephens, creator of TTW


Future of Librarians Interviews

DegreeTutor has a series of interviews up with various library folk. Take a look:

http://www.degreetutor.com/library/librarians-online

Here's mine: http://www.degreetutor.com/library/librarians-online/michael-stephens

I do get talk about grocery stores:

We can learn from the "retail expectations" of our users and potential users. I was amazed to see a high end grocery store chain in Minneapolis offer a meeting room for groups. The Book Club could be meeting at the store - not at the library in the near future! One goal for the L2 library might be to restablish the idea of the commons - that shared space that can be many things to many people and everyone feels ownership. I'm sorry, but a sign stating the rules of the building on the front door is not encouraging. Find ways to make policies and guidlelines friendly...and welcoming.

Do you suggest selling groceries at the library?

Well, no but the idea that a grocery store chain is offering meeting room space - something libraries have done for years - says a lot to me about how once unique services found at the library are being adopted by buisness, etc. For example, what if the same store had not only community meeting space, but a cafe with wifi, a Red Box DVD rental machine and classes about cooking and food. That's so similar to what the library down the street might be offering, it scares me. I am intrigued by the third place and I know I'm not alone.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Shelf Life

NYT July 7, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor


San Francisco

AS summer nears I begin to search my bookshelves for companions. Much like other people return again and again to the same small towns or sandy beaches, I return to the same novelists and with ever greater frequency to the same novels.

My summer friends are expansive and equal to any beach-to-bar evening among the living. The old reliables — Henry James, Edith Wharton, Anthony Trollope — have been with me for a decade or more. Five summers ago they welcomed George Eliot and always they make room for relative newcomers at the table. This past summer, in between rereadings of “The Ambassadors” and “The Age of Innocence,” Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel “The Unconsoled” stepped in.

Reading has made my least favorite season not only one I can now tolerate but one I have begun to look forward to. By actively hating summer for years, I unintentionally built my own protective structure from the elements of sun, sand and fun. Every summer, a very dear friend has her birthday party on the beach. Her e-mail message to me always says “I know you won’t come but...” before giving me the location and date.

Another close friend has given up trying to lure me into climbing a mountain in 100-degree heat. I think she is insane for doing this and she thinks I’m “all about coffee and museums.” How I’ve ended up with such well-adjusted friends is obvious — the others like me are inside their houses or under shady trees or finding the coolest, darkest place for three months to read books and shield their faces.

I grew up in a house of readers but I was actually not one of them.

My father, a professor of Romance languages, sat about the house with small precious volumes from overseas. They were bound in leather and had ribbons sewn into their bindings that our jealous bassets would reach out to paw.

My mother read poetry and mysteries. Anne Sexton and Agatha Christie were stacked on her bedside table.

And my sister read Ray Bradbury and the Bible and in high school went on a C. S. Lewis binge. She sat on a spring-shot sofa in her bedroom that had once been downstairs in the living room, and pored over textbooks for the coming school year.

In our house the difference between summer and all the other seasons was simple. In their bedrooms or my father’s office, the three readers wore shorts instead of slacks. They drank iced tea instead of hot tea. Sleeves were rolled up and if I interrupted, tempers were short.

An undiagnosed case of dyslexia defined me as the non-reader of the family. Stupid was how I felt. In summer I built Barbie a highway out of cardboard and construction paper and ran her over and over again with my Hot Wheels and Matchboxes in a home-grown version of “Attack of the 50-Foot Woman.” I made a secretive, sweaty universe of the space beneath my ancient rope bed, only to find the dust ruffles, my stage curtains, parted by the snout of an equally bored and lonely basset.

Now, in a way that seemed impossible when I was a child, I read maniacally. And I read everything my family did: poetry, mysteries, ancient leather books with ribbons swinging — with two cats, not bassets, pawing them — and old textbooks from the 1800s.

If the phone rings between June and September, I am often jolted out of my make-believe world. I am with Henry James’s Isabel Archer or the ever more poignant Strether, returning over and over again to the cruel fates they can do nothing to change. I’m with Celia and Dorothea, trying on their mother’s jewels and feeling, each time I return to Eliot’s amazing “Middlemarch,” more and more pity for Mr. Casaubon, whom I initially took to be nothing but a mean and bitter prig.

In between the bounty of these larger tomes, when I have an evening to myself because my more social spouse has gone to a party or dinner with friends, I have summer flings — J. L. Carr, Susan Minot, Françoise Sagan, Elfriede Jelinek — and discover previously unknown gems like Julian Greene’s novel “The Other Sleep” or Jane Gardam’s delightfully titled “Old Filth.”

This is summer: it is a time to read and for me at least, despite what many may think, reading is play. It is comfort, company, a way to buffer oneself from the pain and isolation of the everyday. It is the peace I find by visiting my closest friends. I have given up thinking I’m deranged for discovering them between the covers of a book.

Was it really any odder when I hid under my bed or talked aloud to myself or to my basset hounds about people who didn’t exist? Any more bizarre to hang brunette Barbie from the doorknob in an imagined passion play involving Ken and my stuffed Scottie dog? I think not.

I’ve reached an age where I can admit to and even take a strange sort of joy in what some might see as my limits. I had an allergic reaction to Johnson’s Baby Oil the first time I smeared it on my skin and went out into the back yard at 13. The feeling of sand on oil, like the feeling of newspaper when I crumble it in my hand, or the smell of brass on my fingers after using a stairwell or turning a doorknob, unsettles me. My husband sarcastically calls me “his delicate flower,” but I am also the one who attends to an animal’s corpse found under an overpass or empties the occasional sick person’s bedpan.

To me, it is simple. There is our world — the world of mundane annoyances, of heat and grit, and of hideous realities, and there is that other world I visit each summer. My real world. The world of fiction.

Alice Sebold is the author of “The Lovely Bones” and the forthcoming novel “The Almost Noon.”

Potter Has Limited Effect on Reading Habits

J. D. Pooley for The New York Times

Kara Havranek, 13, is not sure if she will read as much post Potter.

Of all the magical powers wielded by Harry Potter, perhaps none has cast a stronger spell than his supposed ability to transform the reading habits of young people. In what has become near mythology about the wildly popular series by J. K. Rowling, many parents, teachers, librarians and booksellers have credited it with inspiring a generation of kids to read for pleasure in a world dominated by instant messaging and music downloads.

And so it has, for many children. But in keeping with the intricately plotted novels themselves, the truth about Harry Potter and reading is not quite so straightforward a success story. Indeed, as the series draws to a much-lamented close, federal statistics show that the percentage of youngsters who read for fun continues to drop significantly as children get older, at almost exactly the same rate as before Harry Potter came along.

There is no doubt that the books have been a publishing sensation. In the 10 years since the first one, “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone,” was published, the series has sold 325 million copies worldwide, with 121.5 million in print in the United States alone. Before Harry Potter, it was virtually unheard of for kids to queue up for a mere book. Children who had previously read short chapter books were suddenly plowing through more than 700 pages in a matter of days. Scholastic, the series’s United States publisher, plans a record-setting print run of 12 million copies for “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” the eagerly awaited seventh and final installment due out at 12:01 a.m. on July 21.

But some researchers and educators say that the series, in the end, has not permanently tempted children to put down their Game Boys and curl up with a book instead. Some kids have found themselves daunted by the growing size of the books (“Sorcerer’s Stone” was 309 pages; “Deathly Hallows,” will be 784). Others say that Harry Potter does not have as much resonance as titles that more realistically reflect their daily lives. “The Harry Potter craze was a very positive thing for kids,” said Dana Gioia, chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, who has reviewed statistics from federal and private sources that consistently show that children read less as they age. “It got millions of kids to read a long and reasonably complex series of books. The trouble is that one Harry Potter novel every few years is not enough to reverse the decline in reading.”

Educators agree that the series can’t get the job done alone.

“Unless there are scaffolds in place for kids — an enthusiastic adult saying, ‘Here’s the next one’ — it’s not going to happen,” said Nancie Atwell, the author of “The Reading Zone: How to Help Kids Become Skilled, Passionate, Habitual, Critical Readers” and a teacher in Edgecomb, Me. “And in way too many American classrooms it’s not happening.”

Young people are less inclined to read for pleasure as they move into their teenage years for a variety of reasons, educators say. Some of these are trends of long standing (older children inevitably become more socially active, spend more time on reading-for-school or simply find other sources of entertainment other than books), and some are of more recent vintage (the multiplying menagerie of high-tech gizmos that compete for their attention, from iPods to Wii consoles). What parents and others hoped was that the phenomenal success of the Potter books would blunt these trends, perhaps even creating a generation of lifelong readers in their wake.

“Anyone who has children or grandchildren sees the competition for children’s time increasing as they enter adolescence, and the difficulty that reading seems to have to compete effectively,” Mr. Gioia said.

Many thousands of children have, indeed, gone from the Potter books to other pleasure reading. But others have dropped away.

Starting when Avram Leierwood was 7, he would read the books aloud with his mother, Mina. “We’d sit in the treehouse in our backyard and take turns,” recalled Ms. Leierwood, of South Minneapolis.

But while Ms. Leierwood has remained an avid fan, Avram, now 15, is indifferent. When “Deathly Hallows” comes out, he will be on a canoe trip. As for reading, he said: “I don’t really have much time anymore. I like to hang out with my friends, talk, go watch movies and stuff, go to the park and play ultimate Frisbee.”

According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a series of federal tests administered every few years to a sample of students in grades 4, 8 and 12, the percentage of kids who said they read for fun almost every day dropped from 43 percent in fourth grade to 19 percent in eighth grade in 1998, the year “Sorcerer’s Stone” was published in the United States. In 2005, when “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” the sixth book, was published, the results were identical.

Many parents, educators and librarians say that despite such statistics, they have seen enough evidence to convince them that Harry Potter is a bona fide hero.

“Parents will say, ‘You know, my son never spent time reading, and now my son is staying up late reading, keeping the light on because he can’t put that book down,’ ” said Linda B. Gambrell, president of the International Reading Association, a professional organization for teachers.

In a study commissioned last year by Scholastic, Yankelovich, a market research firm, reported that 51 percent of the 500 kids aged 5 to 17 polled said they did not read books for fun before they started reading the series. A little over three-quarters of them said Harry Potter had made them interested in reading other books.

Before she discovered Harry Potter, Kara Havranek, 13, spent most of her time romping outside in Parma, a suburb of Cleveland, or playing video games like Crash Bandicoot.

But four years after struggling through “Sorcerer’s Stone,” Kara has read and reread all six books, decorated her bedroom with Potter memorabilia and said she could hardly wait for “Deathly Hallows.”

But although Kara said she has enjoyed other books, she was not sure what lasting influence the series would have. “I probably won’t read as much when Harry Potter is over,” she said.

In a way that was previously rare for books, Harry Potter entered the pop-culture consciousness. The movies (the film version of “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix,” the fifth in the series, just opened) heightened the fervor, spawning video games and collectible figurines. That made it easier for kids who thought reading was for geeks to pick up a book.

Until Harry Potter, “I don’t think kids were reading proudly,” said Connie Williams, the school librarian at Kenilworth Junior High School in Petaluma, Calif. “Now it’s more normalized. It’s like, ‘Gosh we can read now, it’s O.K.’ ”

But creating a habit of reading is a continuous battle with kids who are saturated with other options. During a recent sixth-grade English class at the John W. McCormack Middle School in the Dorchester section of Boston, Aaron Forde, a cherubic 12-year-old, said he loved playing soccer, basketball and football. On top of that, he spends four hours a day chatting with friends on MySpace.com, the social networking site.

He had read the first three Harry Potter books, but said he had no particular interest in reading more. “I don’t like to read that much,” he said. “I think there are better things to do.”

Neema Avashia, Aaron’s English teacher, said it was rare for the Harry Potter series to draw reluctant readers to books. “I try to have a lot of books in my library that reflect where kids are coming from,” Ms. Avashia said. “And Harry Potter isn’t really where my kids are coming from.” She noted that her class is 85 percent nonwhite, and Harry Potter has few characters that belong to a racial minority group.

Some reading experts say that urging kids to read fiction in general might be a misplaced goal. “If you look at what most people need to read for their occupation, it’s zero narrative,” said Michael L. Kamil, a professor of education at Stanford University. “I don’t want to deny that you should be reading stories and literature. But we’ve overemphasized it,” he said. Instead, children need to learn to read for information, Mr. Kamil said, something they can practice while reading on the Internet, for example.

Still, there is something about seeing the passion that a novel can inspire that excites those who want to perpetuate a culture of reading. Even as the Harry Potter series draws to a close, there are signs that other books are coming up to take its place.

On a recent afternoon at at Public School 54 on Staten Island, a group of fifth grade boys shouted with enthusiasm for the “Cirque du Freak” series by Darren Shan, about a boy who becomes entangled with a vampire.

“I like the books so much that even when the teacher is teaching a lesson, I still want to read the books,” said Vincent Eng, a wiry 11-year-old. His classmate Thejas Alex said he had stopped reading a Harry Potter book to jump into “Cirque du Freak.”

“While I was reading them,” Thejas said, referring to the “Cirque” books, “I was like, addicted.”

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Library 2.0 Reading List


Greetings!

Welcome to the Library 2.0 Reading List originally created for the ALA Library 2.0/Library Futures online course.

Library 2.0 in Library Journal | Library 2.0 at Wikipedia

Web 2.0 Overviews & Articles

Optional reading. Resources for Web 2.0.
Intro to Web 2.0
Squidoo lens: Intro to Web 2.0 by Joshua Porter
MIT Technology Reviews: Social Machines
As advanced as our PCs and our other information gadgets have grown, we never really learned to love them. We've used them all these years only because they have made us more productive. But now that's changing. When computing devices are always with us, helping us to be the social beings we are, time spent "on the computer" no longer feels like time taken away from real life. And it isn't: cell phones, laptops, and the Web are rapidly becoming the best tools we have for staying connected to the people and ideas and activities that are important to us. The underlying hardware and software will never become invisible, but they will become less obtrusive, allowing us to focus our attention on the actual information being conveyed. Eventually, living in a world of continuous computing will be like wearing eyeglasses: the rims are always visible, but the wearer forgets she has them on -- even though they're the only things making the world clear.
Newsweek: The New Wisdom of the Web
Cover story on the new Web:

The massive success of MySpace and the exemplary strategy of Flickr are milestones in a new high-tech wave reminiscent of the craziness of the early dot-com days. This rebooting owes everything to the enhanced power and pervasiveness of the Web, which has finally matured to the point where it can fulfill some of the outlandish promises that we heard in the '90s. The generic term for this movement, especially among the hundreds of new companies jamming the waiting rooms of venture-capital offices, is Web 2.0, but that's misleading-some supposedly Web 1.0 companies like eBay and Google have been clueful about this all along. A more fitting description comes from Mary Hodder, the CEO of a social-video-sharing start-up called Dabble. (Since Dabble has not yet launched, I can't explain exactly what that means.) "This is the live Web," she says.
Time: the Multitasking Generation
Time cover story on wired kids:

Many students make brilliant use of media in their work, embedding audio files and video clips in their presentations, but the habit of grazing among many data streams leaves telltale signs in their writing, according to some educators. "The breadth of their knowledge and their ability to find answers has just burgeoned," says Roberts of his students at Stanford, "but my impression is that their ability to write clear, focused and extended narratives has eroded somewhat." Says Koonz: "What I find is paragraphs that make sense internally, but don't necessarily follow a line of argument."
Web 2.0 and Libraries: Best Practices for Social Software
A comprehensive, pass-around resource you and your fellow library staff members can consult to plan your library's social-software initiatives, Stephens's report details numerous successful library implementations of some of today's most used social-software tools, including:

Weblogs (blogs)
Podcasts
RSS feeds
Instant Messaging (IM)
Wikis
Flickr

In the issue, Stephens illustrates how libraries across North America are embracing social software to reach out to their patrons-the report is brimming with examples of libraries' cutting-edge social-software use and strategies, implementation case histories, and best-practice suggestions.

Definitions of L2

  • Library 2.0 is all about library users -- keeping those we have while actively seeking those who do not currently use our services. It's about embracing those ideas and technologies that can assist libraries in delivering services to these groups, and it's about participation -- involving users in service creation and evaluation. Library 2.0 is an operating model that allows libraries to respond rapidly to market needs. This does not mean that we abandon our current users or our mission. It is a philosophy of rapid change, flexible organizational structures, new Web 2.0 tools and user participation that will put the library in a much stronger position, ready to efficiently and effectively meet the needs of a larger user population.

    Michael Casey LibraryCrunch
  • The principles of Library 2.0 seek to put users in touch with information and entertainment wherever they may be, breaking down the barriers of space, time and outdated policy. It is a user-centered paradigm focusing on knowledge, experience, collaboration, the creation of new content and encouraging the heart.

    Michael Stephens Tame the Web
  • Library 2.0 is very much influenced by technology-driven, two-way, social interactions between staff and staff or staff and patrons. L2 has provided a framework within which we've been able to re-evaluate virtually every aspect of classical librarianship with the end goal of usability and findability in mind.

    John Blyberg Blyberg.net
  • Library 2.0 = (books 'n stuff + people + radical trust) x participation

    Darlene Fichter Read Darlene's complete Post here
  • Library 2.0 is the natural evolution of library services to a level where the library user is in control of how and when she gets access to the services she needs and wants.

    Thomas Brevik, Library 1.5

Foundations of L2

Articles, blog posts and white papers.
Do Libraries Matter? (PDF) Chad & Miller
White paper from TALIS that began the discussion.

Put simply, libraries must now begin to use these Web 2.0 applications if they are to prove themselves to be just as relevant as other information providers, and start to deliver experiences that meet the modern user's expectations.
Do Libraries Matter: On Library & Librarian 2.0
Michael Stephens discusses the white paper for ALA TechSource readers, urging them to consider the principles and ideas of this meme.

These are the discussions that must take place in YOUR library. How will you change or improve services to match this new model? Chad and Miller detail four principles; let's look at them and ponder what libraries need to be thinking of sooner than later.
How do you share?
A response from librarian blogger Jessamyn West.

I think one downside to the blog blowup is that sometimes it's easy to put an idea out there online and think "Good, I got the ball rolling, now someone can pick that up and run with it." This is especially hard if we're in jobs or situations that don't allow us the freedom to explore the ideas we have or, in some cases, if our ideas don't jibe with our institutions learning and sharing styles. I like being a philosophizing librarian, but I also think it's important to meet the people who your ideas trickle down to, see how and why they repurpose it, or how and why it works or doesn't work. Our patrons share their hopes and dreams and foibles and ambitions with us all the time, it may be time to give back, become more interactive and collaborative, make that door swing both ways. This is what Library 2.0 means to me.
Where Do We Begin? A Library 2.0 Conversation with Michael Casey
Michael Stephens & Michael Casey discuss L2 and offer steps to move forward.

I hope we can see L2 as a path toward change, toward improvement of services. If we try to overdefine it, we'll never get out of the gate. In some ways, yes, I do think we are our own worst enemies. We get stuck in ruts, providing the same services to the same groups of people, without looking beyond our world to the masses that do yet not use our services. I often speak of reaching for that "Long Tail," the concept of trying to drive toward the large numbers that don't even think of the library as a resource to be used. If we cannot break out of that mold, that way of thinking, then we will never progress.
Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and Librarian 2.0: Preparing for the 2.0 World
Stephen Abram on 2.0:

The beauty of Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 is the level of integration and interoperability that is designed into the interface through your portal or intranet. That's where the real power to enhance the user experience is. In order to take advantage of the concepts inherent in Library 2.0 is the imperative to not shy away from adding advanced functionality and features directly into the content. This would provide the context and workflow-oriented features that users will demand or are demanding already.
Library 2.0 in the Real World
Jenny Levine presents a concrete example of L2 thinking. Casey Bisson's WPopac is a Web catalog built on open source weblog software.

So between the screenshots, list of features, and this example, hopefully this helps clarify where many of us think library services need to go online, which is basically wherever the users are. That means disconnecting our services from being locked away in proprietary silos that patrons have to come to our sites to use. It means getting ourselves out into the major search engines (including ones that search HTML, RSS, OPML, etc.). It means adding interactive features that let users contribute and collaborate with us. It means using the tools and protocols the rest of the world uses so that we can be integrated into their environments, not forcing them to conform to ours.
Web 2.0: Building the New Library
Paul Miller of TALIS explores some of the recent buzz around the concept of 'Web 2.0' and asks what it means for libraries and related organisations.

Libraries were once the guardians of knowledge, and the point at which those seeking existing knowledge would engage with it. With the rise of Google, Amazon, Wikipedia and more, there is an oft-stated fear that many users, much of the time, will bypass processes and institutions that they perceive to be slow, unresponsive, unappealing and irrelevant in favour of a more direct approach to services offered by others that just might be 'good enough' for what they need to do.

Libraries should be seizing every opportunity to challenge these perceptions, and to push their genuinely valuable content, services and expertise out to places where people might stand to benefit from them; places where a user would rarely consider drawing upon a library for support.
Whatever tools take us there are the ones we will use
Michael Casey on the tools of L2:

I think the first thing we need to realize is that Library 2.0 is not a fixed target, and every library's starting point is going to differ. If you've integrated change into every level of your service creation structure then kudos to your system, but most libraries have not reached that point yet, and for them, reaching that stage is a major mile marker on the way to 2.0.

It's easy to say that technology is a panacea for all library service woes, but it's simply not so. New technologies have been allowing us to provide better and better service for years; it's just that we've been providing that service to the same customer base, without effectively reaching out to that part of the demographic that have never been library users. Reaching this diverse group - this long tail, if you will - is a fundamental goal of 2.0.
School Library 2.0
Christopher Harris on School Library 2.0, or "the digitally re-shifted library:"

School Library 2.0 is about refocusing attention to the possibilities provided to a school when it makes use of the school library platform. In addition to librarians, who may base from a library but will also most likely be called upon more and more to be pedagogy and curriculum consultant teachers, the SL2.0 platform can also provide access to resources from and through the library platform in both physical and digital modes. One way to enhance the access is through the use of Web2.0 applications like blogging, RSS, social bookmarking, and wikis. When the school library is a platform, that means it can be like a basecamp (kind of like a BaseCamp) for Web2.0 tool implementations. This only makes sense%u2026as a platform, the school library is the base for curriculum support resources in all their varied formats.
Find the Edge, Push It!
John Blyberg describes the transformative realms of L2:

One of the questions posed to the panel was, where can Library 2.0 make a difference now? Where is the action? I had mentioned four particular areas where I thought L2 could be a change agent: technology, policy, programming, physical spaces. It's important to note that these four areas of change are in no way inherently "library 2.0%u2033-just a part of the conversation.

Discussions of the 2.0 Meme

Community 2.0
Ellyssa Kroski on building community via 2.0 Tools:

Times have changed. The Web has too. What was once considered an ancillary feature of Internet websites has suddenly become the raison d'être. Community is the new consumption. With the emergence of new Web 2.0 tools, the non-technical person has been given a major voice online. In today's online environment all users, regardless of programming knowledge, have been empowered and given a sense of value.
Non-Profit 2.0
Fascinating post in response to discussiuons of the future of non-profits. Read the comments as well:

The essence of Marnie's post for me was that web2.0 technologies are (potentially) driving nonprofits to be more transparent and deliver information and programs that provide better personal attention. From that perspective, it creates a certain amount of competition among NPOs (as well as collaboration opportunities) to really step up and provide services that people need.

Discussions of Library 2.0

Many LIS bloggers continued the discussion and debate via their blogs. Here are just a few of the the posts:
A clear vision for the future of your library
Meredith Farkas:

Maybe it would make sense to ask the miracle question in our libraries. If a miracle occured one night and all of the problems with your library were gone (or we miraculously reached library 2.0 overnight), how would you know that a miracle had occurred? What would be different? What would the library be like? Once you have that vision for what your library/Library 2.0 should look like, what specific steps do you and your colleagues need to take to get there (how do you get to 1.3, 1.6, etc.)? Once you have your answer to those questions, you should have a clear roadmap for reaching your goal. And it's a roadmap written specifically for your library.
What 2.0 Means to me
Scott Walter at the ACRL Blog offers his view of 2.0 and how it realtes to the academic library setting:

Likewise, it is very "2.0 to integrate information literacy instruction into campus educational opportunities outside the classroom, e.g., residence hall and Greek life education, and as part of staff development and faculty development programs sponsored by units such as Human Resources and the Center for Teaching Excellence. Both foster integration, interaction, user feedback, and permeable boundaries between library and other campus services - the very heart of the "Library 2.0%u2033 concept; the heart of the library as "open system."
5 Suggestions for Upgrading to Library 2.0 (or Some Easy Steps to Get Started...Really)
Michael Stephens on 5 things libraries can do to get started on a 2.0 path:

Start a library blog
Create an Emerging Technology Committee
Train staff to use an RSS aggregator
Experiment and use 2.0 Tools
Implement IM reference
Cites & Insights on Library 2.0 & "Library 2.0" (PDF)
Walt Crawford comments and collects blog posts on L2.

Maybe there's a need for more conversations about what libraries can and should do and be. If you accept that it's not possible to be the primary current information source for the whole community and that you can't do everything for everybody, you can start to focus on where new resources should be used, within the context of today's community, tomorrow's needs, and those not well served by other community services. I don't believe those conversations are specific to Library 2.0 or "Library 2.0."
Cites & Insights on Library 2.0 and "Library 2.0"
Blogger Thomas Brevik from Norway discusses Crawford's commentary.

So far it is probably the most thorough treatment of the Library 2.0 conversation that is going on in the biblioblogosphere. Although I think it is a useful piece of work I do worry that the focus is too narrow. Maybe the time for such a summing up has not come. The conversation is new. Crawford seems to have about commented on almost all posts on the Library 2.0 discussion so far. If we say that this conversation is about 6-7 months old it certainly needs a little more time before we should start to dismiss it, or even say that we know what it is.
11 reasons why Library 2.0 exists and matters
John Blyberg explores L2 concepts and the ongoing discussions (backlash!?):

I differ with those that believe L2 is all theory and no action. I'm seeing a number of libraries taking the initiative right now. There are not just gaming conferences, there are actual gaming programs. Individuals are not just talking about their plans to use IM for virtual reference-they're doing it now. Coffee shops are opening up in libraries, policies are being rewritten, facilities are being built to reflect some of these changes. I don't buy that L2 is a passing fancy. In fact, L2 is partially an articulation of the action that is already happening.
L2 Discussions at ALA TechSource
Follow this link for all posts at the ALA TechSource Blog tagged "library 2.0."
On the L2 Train
John Blyberg discusses L2, the IT department and "buzzwords."

I'd suggest that librarians not shut themselves off to the discussions taking place. "Library 2.0" may be a buzz word, but it's not a weightless one. There is actual work and intelligent discussion that accompanies it. L2 is certainly not about exclusion-quite the opposite. You will do yourself and your organization a great disservice is you embed yourself in a semantic quagmire.
A Library 2.0 skeptic's reading list
Steve Lawson collects a few more discussions of the L2 meme with a skepticl theme.

Graphics for the Library 2.0 Meme

By Bonaria Biancu & John Blyberg

Library 2.0 meme map - version 2.0 by bonariabiancu

Library 2.0 meme map - 2nd version

Transformative Realms by jblyberg

The 4 transformative realms of, um, er.. Library 2.0

Library2point0 by Miromurr

Library 2.0 One of the main purposes of this model is to illustrate to myself how I think ab...

Articles for Discussion

These have been used in various Learning 2.0 programs.
Library 2.0 By Casey & Savastinuk
From Library Journal: Libraries are changing. Funding limits and customer demands are transforming staffing levels, service models, access to resources, and services to the public. Administrators and taxpayers are seeking more efficient ways of delivering services to achieve greater returns on financial investments.

Enter Library 2.0. This new model for library service is being discussed online, at conferences, in administrative offices, and at the reference desk. If you and your library staff are not among those already talking 2.0, pay attention; Library 2.0 could revitalize the way we serve and interact with our customers.

The heart of Library 2.0 is user-centered change. It is a model for library service that encourages constant and purposeful change, inviting user participation in the creation of both the physical and the virtual services they want, supported by consistently evaluating services. It also attempts to reach new users and better serve current ones through improved customer-driven offerings. Each component by itself is a step toward better serving our users; however, it is through the combined implementation of all of these that we can reach Library 2.0.
Into a New World of Librarianship by Stephens
From OCLC: One of the principles I would add to the Library 2.0 meme is that "the Library is human" because it makes the library a social and emotionally engaging center for learning and experience. Librarian 2.0, then, is the "strategy guide" for helping users find information, gather knowledge and create content. The most important traits of Librarian 2.0 include:
Librarians 2.0 plans for their users This librarian bases all planning and proposals for services, materials and outreach on user needs and wants. User-centered libraries breakdown barriers and allow users access wherever they are: home, work, commuting, school, or at the library. This involves users from the get go in planning and launching services based on their needs. This librarian asks what new technologies or new materials users need. This librarian proposes building projects and involves users in designing those places. This librarian does not create policies and procedures that impede users' access to the library. This librarian tells users how resources and funds will be expended. Decisions and plans are discussed in open forums and comments are answered. This makes the library transparent.

Flickr pictures tagged "Library 2.0"

TBLC Library 2.0 Challenge display by sylvar

TBLC Library 2.0 Cha...

Mygdal gen-etablerer fælleden by Jacob Bøtter

Mygdal gen-etablerer...

Old school Technorati by Jacob Bøtter

Old school Technorat...

Føhns siger: "The internet is for porn" by Jacob Bøtter

Føhns siger: "...

This is what danish libraries look like on the web by Jacob Bøtter

This is what danish...

This is what information without rich, standard metadata is like. by Jeffrey Beall

This is what informa...

Början på tankekarta om 2.0-saker by Erik

Början på tankekar...

TBLC Library 2.0 Challenge Kickoff - Picture 011 by sylvar

TBLC Library 2.0 Cha...

TBLC Library 2.0 Challenge Kickoff - Picture 015 by sylvar

TBLC Library 2.0 Cha...

del.icio.us / tag / ALAL2

These are sites/articles/posts tagged by the course creators:

L2 Podcasts & Webcasts

Library 2.0 Gang at TALIS
At the end of January, Talis invited a number of those active in the discussion around Library 2.0 to join us on the telephone for the first in a series of conversations intended to probe this emerging space.

Participants were drawn from Europe and North America, and included both the originator of the term and several proponents, as well as more critical voices suggesting that the term itself is possibly obscuring underlying trends.

In this 50 minute edited version of the conversation, we explore what 'Library 2.0' means, and look at some of the changes that this phrase has attempted to capture.
A SirsiDynix Institute Conversation: The 2.0 Meme - Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Librarian 2.0
This conversation has been developing under the series title, Library 2.0. It's a hot conversation and very interesting since the participants have been musing about:
What the next generation of our libraries' Web presence might look like
How we might get there
What are the best components to use
This SirsiDynix Institute is set up as a conversation with three people who are seriously thinking about how to create the next generation of library Web presence - even before we've finished the last generation. Moderated by Stephen Abram, our panel of Michael Casey, Michael Stephens, and John Blyberg will share their insights.

Monday, July 09, 2007

library 2.0

sounds intriguing!

Definition of L2

Library 2.0 is all about library users -- keeping those we have while actively seeking those who do not currently use our services. It's about embracing those ideas and technologies that can assist libraries in delivering services to these groups, and it's about participation -- involving users in service creation and evaluation. Library 2.0 is an operating model that allows libraries to respond rapidly to market needs. This does not mean that we abandon our current users or our mission. It is a philosophy of rapid change, flexible organizational structures, new Web 2.0 tools and user participation that will put the library in a much stronger position, ready to efficiently and effectively meet the needs of a larger user population.